SaaS Mode

✅ Fully White-Labeled SaaS – Agency Feature Control & Pre-Launch Approval System
This is a recurring issue, often raised during Town Halls, especially for agencies offering white-labeled SaaS. The core problem isn’t whether GHL is technically white-labeled. The issue is the lack of agency-level control when new features are pushed live to clients without our knowledge or consent. As white-label providers, we are the face of the platform. We are responsible for client experience, communication, and support. Yet when new features suddenly appear in sub-accounts, without warning, we’re forced into a reactive position, answering for changes we didn’t approve or even know about. What we’re asking for: ✅ 1. Centralised Feature Release Control ➕ Preview upcoming features ➕ Test in a demo account or sandbox ➕ Approve or reject feature rollout and the ability to select SaaS Plan ➕ Ability to delay/hold back features until we’re ready ✅ 2. More Granular Permissions / Packaging ➕ Let us define exactly which features and "sub-features" are included in our SaaS packages ➕ Keep the existing sub-account override system, but allow global-level defaults ➕ Much more granularity. So we can build clean, focused offers without feature bloat ✅ 3. International White Label ➕ Once the translation system is improved (a separate request), we want to control when new features go live based on language readiness ➕ This way, we can avoid launching untranslated features to clients, which breaks UX and looks unprofessional ➕ Even if it means delaying rollout until the translations are available We 100% respect that this is your platform, and you have full freedom to innovate and grow. But if the intention is to support true white-label SaaS resellers, then agencies must be able to control the product our clients see. This is a critical request for serious SaaS agencies who rely on GHL to deliver a stable, branded, and trusted platform experience. 👉🏼 Please add your opinion if you are a white labeled Saas Agency
7
SECURITY RISK - Your own staff can steal your snapshots and go into business themselves, or sell it for $97
Here's what happened. I upgraded to SaaS because GHL pushes it so much. Cool. Until almost immediately, i hired someone off Upwork to help me out, and he started asking a bunch of questions about what the other staff and i had created. Then i looked on his upwork screen capture (thank god) and realized that he was chatting with other people about how much the logic that i had spent $10,000 in labor fees to my staff to create would be worth. His plan was to slowly get upgraded to Agency User, which allows him to export the snapshot. This software operates like a cheap wordpress theme. There is nothing safe about it from a stability standpoint for a business. FIX: Only the owner should be able to export snapshots. SECURITY ISSUE #2. Did you know that if you don't want your agency sub account users, your SaaS clients, to steal the logic, you should turn off access to workflows? Makes sense. There's NO other software i can think of that gives the regular user access to the logic. Can you go in the back of Evernote and change it for yourself? Bucket? Facebook? No. But did you know that if that agency-admin that has workflows turned off adds a staff member, they can give their staff MORE PERMISSIONS THAN THEY HAVE? They can give their staff access to the logic, then take their time recreating it. We made a really amazing product on this platform, and now we're finding that every moment needs to be watched internally. I never would have gone down this path with GHL had i known it would all be so susceptible to theft. I'd never recommend GHL SaaS to anyone. Be careful who you hire.
14
·

in progress

Load More