HIPAA Compliance

Add a Per Sub Account HIPAA Option
Please consider adding a “per-sub-account HIPAA option”, where each agency can simply pay for HIPAA compliance on the specific sub-accounts that need it, instead of being forced into the full $297 agency-wide plan. The current $297 flat fee HIPAA plan might make sense for larger agencies managing hundreds of accounts, but for startups, small agencies, or single-location businesses using GoHighLevel internally, this pricing model is simply unrealistic. When you also factor in the 30% currency conversion for Canadian users, the cost becomes significantly higher, making HIPAA compliance nearly impossible to justify unless operating at a large scale. Adding a per sub account HIPAA option (for example, $25–$50 per HIPAA-enabled sub-account) would make GoHighLevel accessible to thousands of small teams, startups, and healthcare businesses that currently can’t justify the $297 jump. You could even make it annual-only if you prefer with volume breaks and it would still be a win for both sides: users get affordability, and GHL gets more committed, longer-term revenue. For comparison: Google Workspace provides a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) at no additional cost. Zoho CRM includes full HIPAA compliance within its $29/user plan... that’s the entire CRM price, not an extra HIPAA fee. We’re not asking to change or replace the current structure, the $297 plan can stay for large agencies who need it. But introducing a second, lower-cost HIPAA tier would make GoHighLevel far more accessible to: Small agencies and startups still building their client base. Healthcare businesses and clinics using GHL internally. Both pricing models could run side by side, large agencies continue with the $297 plan, while smaller teams gain an entry-level HIPAA option This approach would: Expand your market reach, especially into the growing healthcare vertical where HIPAA is non-negotiable. Attract migrations from platforms like Zoho and HubSpot, where compliance is already included. Increase overall adoption and long-term loyalty, as smaller businesses can start affordably and scale up within the GoHighLevel ecosystethis-And best of all you'll actually make more money this way as more start ups can afford paying you for the add-on. This isn’t about discounting the platform’s value... it’s about removing barriers, opening new revenue channels, and supporting future growth across all business sizes. Please consider this.
2
Feature Request: Self-Hosting Option for Go High Level (e.g. via AWS or Azure) to Support GDPR and Data Residency Requirements
As Go High Level continues to grow globally, especially in the European market, data privacy and compliance are becoming critical concerns for agencies working under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Currently, Go High Level is hosted on US-based servers, which means all customer data is transferred outside the EU. While Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) offer a legal mechanism for this, the reality is that many European businesses—agencies and clients alike—prefer or require full data residency within the EU to minimize legal risks and meet local compliance expectations. 👉 That’s why we’re proposing a Self-Hosting Option: Give agencies the ability to host Go High Level in their own infrastructure (e.g. on AWS, Azure, or another GDPR-compliant cloud provider within the EU or other required regions). Benefits of this feature: ✅ Full control over data location and security ✅ Easier compliance with GDPR and local privacy laws ✅ Increased trust with EU-based clients ✅ Opens new markets in countries with strict data residency requirements ✅ Reduces friction for enterprise and public sector adoption This wouldn’t replace the existing cloud offering but would give agencies who need it the flexibility to operate in highly regulated environments—something that would make Go High Level stand out in a rapidly evolving privacy landscape. If you support this idea, please upvote and leave a comment. Let’s help make GHL even more flexible and future-proof!
3
·
under review
Load More