This is a recurring issue, often raised during Town Halls, especially for agencies offering white-labeled SaaS. The core problem isn’t whether GHL is technically white-labeled. The issue is the lack of agency-level control when new features are pushed live to clients without our knowledge or consent.
As white-label providers, we are the face of the platform. We are responsible for client experience, communication, and support. Yet when new features suddenly appear in sub-accounts, without warning, we’re forced into a reactive position, answering for changes we didn’t approve or even know about.
What we’re asking for:
✅ 1. Centralised Feature Release Control
➕ Preview upcoming features
➕ Test in a demo account or sandbox
➕ Approve or reject feature rollout and the ability to select SaaS Plan
➕ Ability to delay/hold back features until we’re ready
✅ 2. More Granular Permissions / Packaging
➕ Let us define exactly which features and "sub-features" are included in our SaaS packages
➕ Keep the existing sub-account override system, but allow global-level defaults
➕ Much more granularity. So we can build clean, focused offers without feature bloat
✅ 3. International White Label
➕ Once the translation system is improved (a separate request), we want to control when new features go live based on language readiness
➕ This way, we can avoid launching untranslated features to clients, which breaks UX and looks unprofessional
➕ Even if it means delaying rollout until the translations are available
We 100% respect that this is your platform, and you have full freedom to innovate and grow. But if the intention is to support true white-label SaaS resellers, then agencies must be able to control the product our clients see.
This is a critical request for serious SaaS agencies who rely on GHL to deliver a stable, branded, and trusted platform experience.
👉🏼 Please add your opinion if you are a white labeled Saas Agency