Warm transfers to LC Phone numbers?
planned
B
Brian Pappalardo
Hey there! You all just released warm transfers, which is great - but why can't we transfer to a LC phone number? The only option when we're transferring to a user is to transfer to their personal cell phone that they put in their profile settings. We really need to be able to transfer to their dedicated LC number instead.
Thanks!
Log In
B
Brian Del Terzo (AiDR)
This limitation creates real workflow challenges. Right now, the LC Phone number isn’t tied to the user record in a way that allows automations or workflows to reference it dynamically.
Using Custom Values as a workaround is cumbersome and error-prone, especially for appointment-related automations. For example, if an appointment is reassigned to another user, the workflow continues under the original Custom Value and ends up sending messages with the wrong phone number.
What’s really needed is a system-level field (or merge field) that allows the LC Phone number assigned to a user to be referenced anywhere {{user.phone}} can be, including automations, call routing, and warm transfers. This would resolve both transfer limitations and dynamic routing issues without having to hardcode numbers.
Excited to see this come to fruition!
M
Michael Taylor
Please prioritize this asap. This seems like a no brainer.
R
Ryan Kabel
Michael Taylor 100% agree.
R
Rosebell Bicar
Please vote for this post, will gather more community members to flood there to make GHL team realize they've been neglecting crucial privacy concerning features.
R
Rosebell Bicar
Their phone system configuration is just for the lack of better term, sucks. imagine not being able to transfer a call within the same subaccount to another user on that subaccount because you would need to assign their personal number on their profile, which of course, would result to not just paying for 2 phone services, but if that personal phone assigned to the user's profile is not on the computer, they would have to pick up the call on a hard phone or mobile phone, which is extreme suffering for businesses that are customer service reliant AKA, contact centers.
In addition to this, you cannot even add all active users to received inbound calls using the default phone number, as there's a limit of 6 users only, which is not really a good limitation, and I don't see no benefits with them restricting us this much.
B
Brian Del Terzo (AiDR)
Rosebell Bicar - I believe this can be addressed (at least temporarily) through the use of Custom Values for the scenario you described.
Create static Custom Values:
{{custom.LC_Phone_User_1}} = +12345678944
{{custom.LC_Phone_User_2}} = +12345678945
{{custom.LC_Phone_User_3}} = +12345678946
Use conditional logic in automations:
Calls for each user can then be routed or transferred to their respective Custom Value — for example, {{custom.LC_Phone_User_1}}, {{custom.LC_Phone_User_2}}, and so on.
Avoid referencing {{user.phone}}:
That field always pulls from the profile and can’t reference the LC number due to potential call loop conflicts. Instead, rely on the predefined LC Custom Values.
This workaround should cover most needs until GHL adds a true merge field for the assigned LC Phone number.
R
Ryan Kabel
Please prioritize this feature. Not having internal extensions and Ques Is challenging to use the phone feature as a complete replacement to other business phone systems.
C
CHEK Tech
Any update or ETA's on this?
W
Wagner Vieitas
Please get this prioritized. much love ghl team
A
Andres Patino
I recently ported my main business number into GoHighLevel's Phone LC system so I could track both outbound and inbound calls in one place. However, since the number I ported is my primary line, I’m unable to forward calls to other numbers—this seems to be causing confusion within the system and has led to several bugs.
To streamline operations, I set up multiple users to share the same phone line. I enabled multiring but did not assign each user a unique number, with the intention that they could all answer and make calls from the same number. This setup would allow me to record all incoming and outgoing calls to the business, regardless of which user handles the call.
Unfortunately, warm and cold transfers aren't working, likely because the individual users don’t have numbers assigned to them.
Is there a specific department or team at GoHighLevel that can assist me with properly configuring our phone system to support this kind of setup?
Ronak Jindal
Merged in a post:
Incoming call rerouting/transfer to an extension.
M
Muhammad Tahir
It would be great idea to introduce call rerouting/transfer to an extension instead of phone number. the idea is to reroute the call to user by an extension without assigning phone number to that user. much needed feature
Ronak Jindal
planned
Coming around June-July
J
John Betterr
Ronak Jindal Can you prioritize design that is "broken"? New features are great, but a solid foundation is better. Basic stuff like phone ringing on LC when set to mobile, or the phone ringing on LC when set to mobile, but active on another location.
R
Rosebell Bicar
John Betterr Agree2x, plus petition to not limit the number of users that can be assigned to a number to receive inbound calls.
R
Rosebell Bicar
Ronak Jindal Hello Ronak, do we have any update on this by any chance.
R
Ryan Kabel
Ronak Jindal It would be great to have the latest info on where this feature is on being launched. Thank you for considering.
Load More
→